?

Log in

No account? Create an account
entries friends calendar profile Previous Previous Next Next
Language Computeer
Fists of irony
regarding this attempt, by one of my Senators, to spike protection to citizen journalists within the proposed shield law.

I wrote Senator Feinstein:

in re: US Sen 448:

Please do not strike the provisions that shield unpaid and/or anonymous journalists. The shield laws suggested here should apply to the *act* of journalism, not only those who can afford to be paid for it.

The spirit of the shield law -- protecting journalists for doing their work towards uncovering and reporting the truth -- is entirely in the spirit of American liberty. Anonymity (and unpaid work!) goes back at least to Ben Franklin and Tom Paine.

Choosing to create a "protected class" of paid or professional journalists merely leaves the unprotected class -- journalists working to report, agitate, or explore, despite the absence of a patron -- even weaker.

Please withdraw your amendment to US Sen 448.

[trochee]
California resident, US citizen and voter

[ETA] If you live in a state with a Senator on the Judiciary committee, write him or her yourself. The list is here.
4 comments or Leave a comment